Teacher's assessment
I will begin by sharing the Teacher's assessment rubric that I made for my unit:|
Mark
Activity
|
1 (needs development)
|
2 (Novice)
|
3 (Competent)
|
4 (Expert)
|
|
Starting activity
|
Can’t tell any difference between chemical and
physical change
|
Can explain some examples but can’t make a
scientific definition
|
Can make good definition with appropriate examples
|
Makes a perfect scientific definition with examples
|
|
Adjusting chemical coefficients
|
Does not participate in the activity
|
Knows how to identify an incorrect reaction but
fails to adjust by himself or herself
|
Can do most of the exercises
|
Can do all the exercises and explain the need of
doing the adjustment
|
|
Chemical reaction rate
|
Can’t explain the topic he or she worked with
|
Is able to explain his or her topic to others and
has a basic knowledge of the other topics
|
Knows all the topics of reaction rate
|
Knows all the topics of reaction rate and can tell
some real life examples
|
|
Practice (chemical reaction rate)
|
Does not participate in the activity
|
Can understand the phenomena that takes place but
can’t design an experimental proposal
|
Can make a reasonable research proposal and explains
the results of the experiment
|
Makes a good research proposal and explains the
results perfectly
|
|
The mol
|
Can’t explain anything from the new concept
|
Has a basic idea of the concept and application
|
Knows the concept and can make most numerical
exercises
|
Can explain the concept and mathematically apply it
|
|
Concentration calculations
|
Can’t make conversion factors
|
Makes some of the required calculations
|
Makes most of the required calculations
|
Makes all of the required calculations and explains
them
|
|
Driving question
|
Can’t understand what is being asked
|
Can explain what is asked but can’t answer it
|
Knows how to approach it and gets to the solution
|
Gets the answer and explains all of the steps
|
|
Language
|
Never uses English
|
Knows some of the CALP and uses some of the BICS and
scaffolded language
|
Uses English most of the time and knows all the CALP
and some of the BICS and scaffolded language
|
Uses English most of the time without mistakes
|
|
Working diary
|
Not used or poorly done
|
Frequently done but not concisely and correctly
|
Frequently and extensively done but with some
mistakes
|
Done every day, extensively and correctly
|
Peer's assessment
Secondly, I will share with you the Peer's assessment. That is: a tool for students group to assess their work in a task.
Activty: chemical reaction rate
You will
work in groups of 4. After finishing the tasks, each member of the group will
get marks by the other members of the group. The marks will range from 1 to 4,
being 1 the lowest mark and 4 the highest.
|
Name
|
Contribution to task development
|
Team work and cooperation
|
Personal work
|
Final mark
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Self assessment
In third place, I am sharing with you a self assessment tool for students. It should help them to find their weakest and strongest points and how to improve their work.
Read the
rubric. It has a series of items that will be evaluated. Think about the
activities that you have been doing and your work on them. Follow the criteria
from the rubric and propose a mark for each of the items.
|
Activity
|
Mark (1-4)
|
|
Starting activity
|
|
|
Adjusting chemical coefficients
|
|
|
Chemical reaction rate
|
|
|
Practice (chemical reaction rate)
|
|
|
The mol
|
|
|
Concentration calculations
|
|
|
Driving question
|
|
|
Language
|
|
|
Working diary
|
|
Now,
explain in the back of the paper the reason of the marks you have given to
yourself. Which is the activity you did best and why? Which one is the worst
and why? Which are the kind activities that you perform better?
Finally,
what could you do to improve you work?
Thinking routine
Next, I am sharing with you a thinking routine adapted to a topic of my unit:
|
TITLE OF THE
THINKING ROUTINE:
Question starts. This is an “understanding
routine”. It will take place around “the mole” topic
|
|
EXPLANATION:
The mole topic is a very abstract one. I will
introduce some basic ideas about the topic and then let them think some
questions about it. These questions will help to introduce the topic and they
will try to understand the following explanations and activities in order to
have better answers to their questions.
|
|
RESOURCES:
List of questions:
Why…?
Why is the volume the same in any substance?
Why is it useful to use Avogadro’s number?
How would it be different if…? What are the reasons...?
What are the reasons of the mass difference between
atoms?
Suppose that…
Suppose that 2 molecules of CO react with 1 molecule of O2 to generate 2 molecules of CO2. Would the volume increase or decrease? What if we need to know…?
Can we predict the volume of the products?
What if we knew...? What is the purpose of...?
What is the purpose of using the mole concept by
scientists?
What would change if the molecule is formed by 4 atoms instead of 1? |
|
HOW ARE YOU
GOING TO USE IT?
I will introduce some basic ideas about the
topic and then let them think some questions about it. They will answer to
the questions by pairs and they will share some of them with the class.
These questions will help to introduce the
topic and they will try to understand the following explanations and
activities in order to have better answers to their questions.
Then, we will work in the mole topic and they
will have time to reexamine their answers.
|
Finally, I will answer the required questions:
- What did you learn? I learnt to do a rubric. I have never done or used one before. I also learnt about assessment tools
- How did you learn? By reading and trying to apply it to my CLIL unit.
- Do you have any problem? No
- Would you like to investigate a bit more about any subject? Yes, about thinking routines. I find there are a lot of them but it is not easy to find what you need.
- Which question do you propose to someone who read this post to help you with CLIL? Are you familiarised with thinking routines applied to science? Which ones are useful for you?
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario